More sourcing channels
Direct applications, internal teams, agencies, referrals and talent platforms can all reach the same candidate.
Product in development
One trusted record.
From introduction to decision.
InterviewTree is building a shared hiring workspace where employers and recruitment partners establish candidate provenance, resolve competing submission claims and make structured, evidence-led hiring decisions—with accountable people retaining final judgment.
Candidate provenance record In development
AM
CANDIDATEAlex MorganSenior Data Platform Lead
Claim review12 SEP · 09:42Authorized vendor submissionConsent recorded · Role linked · Terms valid
03 MAR · 14:18Previous direct applicationDifferent role · Protection period expired
Preliminary status: clear claimThe current submission meets the employer’s agreed submission rules.
Candidate provenance
A verified record of how, when and by whom a candidate was introduced—including candidate consent, the relevant role and the agency terms that apply.
The problem
Commercial submission claims should not be decided by scattered emails and competing timestamps.
A candidate may have applied directly, spoken to several recruiters or been submitted for another role months earlier. When consent, terms and prior contact sit in different systems, disputes over fee entitlement delay hiring and damage valuable partnerships.
When the evidence is scattered, employers risk double fees, vendors risk losing legitimate claims, and candidates become caught between competing accounts.
InterviewTree creates a shared evidence trail before the dispute begins—and carries that structure into the hiring decision itself.
Competing agency feesDuplicate submissionsUnclear authorizationDelayed hiringDamaged vendor relationships
Why now
Hiring became more connected.
The evidence did not.
More routes to talent create more opportunities to hire—and more ways for the history behind an introduction to become unclear.
More overlapping contact
Candidates increasingly engage with several recruiters and employers across roles, markets and points in time.
Context gets lost
Applicant tracking systems record activity, but often lack the consent, terms and relationship context needed to assess a claim.
AI increases the volume
Automated sourcing expands outreach, making clear authorization and defensible provenance more important—not less.
Candidate provenance
Create a reliable record of who introduced a candidate, for which role, with what consent and under which agreed terms.
Submission claim resolution
Apply configurable rules to competing claims and give employers and vendors a transparent evidence trail for resolution.
Decision intelligence
Bring scorecards, candidate evidence and interviewer judgment together in a structured, human-accountable decision record.